SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Kar) 308

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
A. VENKATESHA – Appellant
Versus
GANGANAPALLT RAMAKKA – Respondent


M. P. CHANDRAKANTARAJ, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's second appeal against the concurrent findings of the courts below. Parties to this appeal will be referred to by the rank and title they had in the trial Court.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the suit against the defendant for declaration that he was the owner of the suit property and to declare that the defendant was in permissive possession of the hut and also possession and mesne profits both past and future. It was his case that he purchased from P. W. 1, 24 guntas of dry agricultural land situated in Lakkavalli village of tarikere Taluk; that the land purchased by him was in Survey No. 120/2; that it was bounded on the east and West by road while on north and South by adjoining Survey Numbers 1. 21 and 120/2 respectively; that his vendor had retained 11 guntas of land out of the share that had fallen to him at a partition and therefore, those 11 guntas was actually the boundary on the eastern side of the plaintiff's land. It was his further averment in the plaint that he had permitted the defendant and her husband to construct a temporary structure and reside on the land. However, the defendant was refusing to vacate his land ins















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top