SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Kar) 74

M.S.NESARGI
GOVINDAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SECY. , MUNICIPAL FIRST GRADE COLLEGE, CHINTAMANI – Respondent


M. S. NESARGI, J.

( 1 ) THESE are plaintiffs' second appeals. The plaintiffs filed O. S. No. 24 of 1969 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Kolar against the respondents as defendants, 1 and 2 for the following reliefs. (1) For Cancelling the settlement deed dated 6-7-1966 so far as the first item of the suit property is concerned, since the gifts have been revoked, and the gift deed dated 2-6-1966 in regard to the 2nd item of the plaint schedule as the gift has been revoked. (2) Declaring the title of the plaintiffs to the suit schedule properties. (3) Directing the defendants or others on their behalf by a permanent injunction from interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties. (4) Directing the defendants to pay costs of the proceedings and any such reliefs as is warranted in the circumstances of the case. The trial Court decreed the suit. Defendant 1 preferred R. A. No. 1 of 1972 and defendant 2 preferred R. A. No. 2 of 1972 in the Court of the District Judge, Kolar. The learned District Judge allowed both the appeals. Hence, these two appeals are filed by the plaintiffs.

( 2 ) THE suit properties are 1 acre 22 guntas in Survey




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top