SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Kar) 304

K.A.SWAMI, P.C.JAIN, P.P.BOPANNA
B. SATHYANARAYANA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL – Respondent


P. P. BOPANNA, J.

( 1 ) A Division Bench of this Court consisting of My Lord the Chief Justice and Venkatesh, J. has referred the following question for the opinion of Full bench. "whether a permit granted in violation of the provisions of sub-sec. (3) of sec. 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, can be validated solely on the ground that the operator has operated the stage carriage services on the route for a long period and that interference with such unlawful grant on a hypertechnical ground would not be in public interest ?"

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this reference are succinctly stated in the order of reference made by the Division Bench. Therefore, it is not necessary to burden the record by repeating them in our order.

( 3 ) THE permits in question which were the subject matter of challenge before the learned Single Judge were admittedly granted in violation of the provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act (in short 'the Act' ). But, they were sought to be validated on the ground that the Petitioners/operators had operated the stage carriage services on the routes in question for a long period and, therefore, this Court should not on a Technical gr


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top