SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 544

K.B.NAVADGI, S.A.HAKEEM
RAMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
GODAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
Kadidal Manjappa, M.S.GOPALKRISHNA, N.K.Ramesh

( 1 ) 1. This petition has come before us on a refeience made by the learned Single judge to consider the following questions of law :1) Whether the defendants can file an application seeking temporary injunction against the plaintiffs in a suit filed by the plaintiffs ? and2) Whether the decision of this court in Suganda Bai v Sulu Bai B others (1975 (1) Kar. L. J. , 967) places any restriction in the matter of grant of temporary injunction in favour of defendants in a suit filed by the plaintiffs?

( 2 ) PETITIONERS were defendants and the respondents were plaintiffs in the trial Court. For the sake of convenience the parties will be referred to by their status In the Court below.

( 3 ) THE brief facts, leading to this reference are as follows : the plaintiffs filed a suit in O. S. No. 19 of 1980 on the file of the Civil Judge at Chikkaballapur, claiming partition and separate possession of their two-thirds share in the plaint schedule properties which are alleged to be the joint family properties of the plaintiffs and the defendants. In the said suit, the defendants filed an interlocutory application (I A V), seeking temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiffs from interfering









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top