SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Kar) 270

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
BHARATHI – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES – Respondent


Advocates:
A.NIMMI SWAMY, B.TILAK HEGDE, M.N.PRAMILA, Manjunath Allur, S.B.SWETHADRI, S.SHIVASWAMY

CHANDRAKANTARAJ, J.

( 1 ) ALL the above petitions are disposed of by the following common order as the questions of law raised and the facts are similar. For the purpose of convenience, the facts stated in W. P. 24193 to 24198 of 1981 are taken and followed.

( 2 ) IN these batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have made a common grievance of certain events to which a brief reference will be made later in the course of the order, and have sought for the following reliefs : (I) to issue a writ of mandamus or similar writ or order or direction to respondents 1 to 3 to register the amendment to bye-law as approved by the General body of the fourth respondent on 25- 12-1973; (II) to issue a writ of mandamus or similar writ or order or direction to respondents 1 to 3 to direct the fourth respondent not to act contrary to the amendments made to the bye-law approved by the General Body on 25-12-1973. (III) to issue a writ of certiorari or similar order or direction to quash the cancellation deeds executed by the fourth respondent and registered by the fifth respondent as at Annexures 'b' to 'g'; and (IV) to grant such other consequential reliefs including cost deemed fit in the circumst






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top