SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 43

M.RAMA JOIS, S.R.BABU
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
R. N. SHETTY – Respondent


Advocates:
CHANDRASEKHARAIAH, P.VISHWANATH SHETTY

RAJENDRA BABU, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed under Section 39 (1) of the Arbitration Act questioning the legality and correctness of the judgment and decree dated 18-4-1987 made by the learned Civil Judge, Yadgir, in Misc. No. 2/ 1987, on his file, making award Rule of the Court.

( 2 ) THE essential facts, in brief, are as follow: the construction work in respect of Upper Krishan Project Narayanapur Left Bank Canal Reach No. 1 from Km 35. 5 to Km 41 excluding Rajankollur Tunnel from Ch. 26. 231 to 39. 834, was granted to the respondent under an agreement dated 7-1-1980. The value of the contract was fixed at Rs. 115. 12 lakhs which increases by 3. 22 per cent above the estimated cost. The agreement dated 7-1-1980 stipulated that the contract was to be executed within thirty months fixing the date of completion of the contract on 23-7-1982. Disputes arose between the contractors and the appellants during the progress of the work which could not be settled between them. Clauses 71 and 72 of the agreement provided that in the event of disputes the matters in dispute could be arbitrated in the manner provided therein. Consequently, a panel of three arbitrators was appointed to go into





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top