Karnataka High Court
Matter of Ashraya - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
Decided On : 03-30-90
M.F. : 670 of 1990
GUARDIANSHIP - FAMILY COURT JURISDICTION - Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 7, Section 26 - The court discussed the nature of the proceedings under Sections 7 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and whether they fall under the jurisdiction of the Family Court established under the Family Courts Act, 1984. The court examined the history and objectives of the Family Court and the provisions of the Act, and concluded that the Family Court had exclusive jurisdiction over the proceedings initiated under the Guardians and Wards Act, directing the applications to be presented before the Family Court.
Fact of the Case:
The appeals were filed against the order of the Court of the XIX Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, directing the return of petitions filed under Sections 7 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and requiring the petitioners to avail of the provisions in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The main issue was whether the proceedings under the Guardians and Wards Act fell under the jurisdiction of the Family Court established under the Family Courts Act, 1984.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the proceedings initiated under the Guardians and Wards Act, concerning guardianship and custody of minors, fell within the jurisdiction of the Family Court established under the Family Courts Act, 1984. The court affirmed the order directing the applications to be presented before the Family Court.
Issues: The main issue was whether the proceedings under the Guardians and Wards Act, initiated before the City Civil Judge, fell under the jurisdiction of the Family Court established under the Family Courts Act, 1984.
Ratio Decidendi: The court analyzed the history and objectives of the Family Court, the provisions of the Family Courts Act, 1984, and the nature of the proceedings under the Guardians and Wards Act, and concluded that the Family Court had exclusive jurisdiction over such proceedings.
Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, and the court affirmed the order directing the applications to be presented before the Family Court. The court held that the Family Court had exclusive jurisdiction over the proceedings initiated under the Guardians and Wards Act.
( 1 ) THESE appeal are preferred by petitioner in two Guardians and Wards cases against the common order date 22-9-1989 made in 26 such clubbed cases by the Court of the XIX Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore ("court of City Civil Judge"), directing return of the petitions filed by them under section 7 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 ("the G and W Act"), as per Rule 10 of Order VII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("the Code"), at the same time requiring the petitioners to avail of the provisions in Rule 10-A of Order VII of the Code.
( 2 ) ). The point, rather of considerable importance, which arises for our decision in these appeals, is whether the proceedings in the petitions filed by the appellants-petitioners in the Court of City Civil Judge (the District Court) under Section 7 and 26 of the G and W Act, are proceedings of the nature falling under clause (g) of the explanation to sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the Family Courts, Act, 1984 ("the Act"), respecting which the Family Court established under the Act shall have and exercise jurisdiction.
( 3 ) AS the history of the Family Court and the salient aspects of the Act providing for establishment of Family Court could prove to be of considerable advantage in the rendering of our decision on the said point, we shall briefly refer to them at the out-set.
( 4 ) LAW Commission of India ("the Law Commission"), in its Fifty-fourth Report on the Code forwarded to Government of India in the year 1973, while recommending introduction of a new Order, Order XXXII-A, into the Code to deal with matters relating to family, gave reasons therefor in Chapter 32a of that Report thus:"32a. 2. In the administration of justice in disputes relating to the family, one has to keep in mind the human relationship with which one is dealing. The objective of family counselling, as a method of achieving the ultimate object of preservation of the family, is to be kept in the forefront. 32a. 3. Litigation concerning or involving affairs of the family, therefore, requires a special approach, in view of the serious emotional aspects involved. For this sensitive area of personal relationship, our ordinary judicial procedure is not ideally suited. As Sir Garfield Bafwick (then Attorney-General of Australia), said in the debates on the Matrimonial Clauses Bill, 1959, the Judge not unnaturally feels reticent about intruding into the human relationship of those who come before him; and the parties themselves so often enter into a conspiracy of silence, where their innermost secrets are concerned. 32a. 4. It is now being increasingly realised that- (a) as far as possible, an integrated broad based service to families in trouble, should become a part of the Court system; (b) the existing court structure should be so organised that one single court should deal with the problem of preserving the families; and (c) the conventional procedure dominated by the adversary system may not be appropriate for disputes concerning the family. 32 A. 5. Many of these matters are outside the scope of this Report; moreover, it will require considerable time and effort to re-mould the legal system to make it an effective instrument for dealing with them. Nevertheless, it is felt that so far as the Code of Civil Procedure is concerned, it may be desirable to have special provisions on some matters, - provisions which highlight the need for adopting a different approach, where matters concerning the family are at issue, including the need for efforts to bring about an amicable settlement. "
( 5 ) THEN the Law Commission, in its Fiftyninth Report on Hindu Marriage Act and Special Marriage Act, forwarded to Government of India in the year 1974, expressed its view on the need of establishment of Family Courts to deal with matters concerning the family by adoption of a human approach thus:"in our Report on the Code of Civil Procedure, we have had occasion to emphasise that in dealing with disput
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.