1990 Supreme(Kar) 227
Karnataka High Court
V.S.ACHARYA - Appellant
Versus
RETURNING OFFICER AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA SOUTH-WESTGRADUATES CONSTITUENCY, MANGALORE AND OTHERS - Respondent
Decided On : 06-22-90
Election Petition : 1 of 1986
B.J.SOMAYAJI, K.R.D.KARANTH, MOHANDAS N.HEADE
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of whether a post held in an institution is an office of profit under the government, considering factors such as appointment, control, supervision, and financial aspects.
Headnote:
Election Petition - Representation of People Act - 1951 - Section 81 - The court considered whether the post of assistant professor in English held by the respondent in the National Institute of Engineering College run by the National Institute of Engineering Society at Mysore is an office of profit under the government of Karnataka. The court found that the post held by the respondent is not an office of profit under the state government.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an unsuccessful candidate in the election for the Karnataka legislative council, sought a declaration that the election of respondent-2 was void due to holding an office of profit under the Karnataka state government.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the post held by respondent-2 in the National Institute of Engineering College is not an office of profit under the government of Karnataka, leading to the dismissal of the election petition.
Issues: The issues included whether the post held by respondent-2 was an office of profit under the government of Karnataka, whether respondent-2 was disqualified for being chosen as a member of the legislative council, and whether the election of respondent-2 was affected and had to be declared void.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered various factors, including the appointment, control, supervision, and financial aspects, to determine whether the post held by respondent-2 was an office of profit under the state government.
Final Decision: The election petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to pay the costs of Rs. 2,000 to respondent-2.
( 1 ) IN this election petition presented under Section 81 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 ("the act"), the petitioner, an unsuccessful candidate in the election held from the Karnataka south-west graduates constituency to fill the seat in the Karnataka legislative council of its member retiring on 30th june, 1986, has sought for a declaration that the election of respondent-2, the returned candidate from that constituency, is void and a further declaration that he (the petitioner) is the returned candidate in that election.
( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner, as set out in the petition, is briefly:- nomination papers of the petitioner, respondent-2, respondent-3 and respondent-4 for the election to be held on 22-6-1986 respecting the membership of the Karnataka legislative council from the Karnataka south-west graduates constituency were duly filed before respondent-1, the returning officer of that election. One V. Dhananjaya kumar, on his own behalf and as the authorised agent of the petitioner, filed an objection statement before the returning officer objecting to the acceptance of the nomination of respondent-2, by pleading that he (respondent-2) was disqualified under article 191 (1) (a) of the Constitution of India for being chosen as a member of the Karnataka legislative council since the post of an assistant professor in english held by him in the national institute of engineering, Mysore ("the n. i. e. "), was an office of profit under the Karnataka state government. But, the returning officer, who found no merit in that objection, accepted the nomination of respondent-2, along with the nominations of the petitioner, respondent-3 and respondent-4 and declared all of them to be the contesting candidates in the said election. Thereafter, the election among those contesting candidates being held, counting of valid votes cast in favour of each of them was done. On such counting of votes, rcspondent-2, who was found to have secured highest number of valid votes among the contesting candidates, was, by the declaration dated 23-6-1986 of the returning officer, declared as the returned candidate duly elected to fill the seat for which election was held. According to the petitioner, the acceptance by the returning officer (respondent-1) of the nomination of respondent-2, who was disqualified under article 191 (1) (a) of the Constitution for being chosen as a member of the Karnataka legislative council because of the post of an assistant professor in english held by him in the n. i. e. , an office of profit under the Karnataka state government, being improper, has materially affected the result of his election. The averments made in the petition in support of the plea that rcspondent-2 held an office of profit under the Karnataka state government, are (i) that the n. i. e. college in which rcspondent-2 held the post of assistant professor in english being an instrumentality of a state, he must be held to be holding an office of profit under the state; and (ii) that respondent-2, assistant professor in english in the n. i. e. college, a recipient of aid from the state government, who was receiving his entire salary from the state government directly, paid out of its consolidated fund, has to be regarded as a person holding an office of profit under the Karnataka state government. The election petition had been, therefore, filed for obtaining a declaration that the election of respondent-2 was void and a further declaration that the petitioner was duly elected as a member in the place of respondent-2.
( 3 ) RESPONDENT-2, in his written statement filed respecting the election petition of the petitioner, has stated thus: the returning officer had properly accepted respondent-2's nomination, in that, the post of an assistant professor in english held by him in the n. i. e. was not an office of profit under the Karnataka state government. The n. i. e. is a private educational institution, which is run by a