Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, V. D. TULZAPURKAR, A. V. VARADARAJAN, O. CHHINNAPPA REDDY, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
State Of Gujarat: Mathuradas Mohanlal Kedia – Appellant
Versus
Raman Lal Keshav Lal Soni: S. D. Munshaw – Respondent
JUDGMENT
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :— The attitude of the State of Gujarat in these cases has indeed left us puzzled and wondering. On the one hand, there are lakhs of employees working under various Panchayat Institutions, call them Government servants or no, to whom the benefits of the recommendations of the two Pay Commissions, the Sarela and the Desai Commissions, have been extended, while on the other hand, there is a microscopic number (comparatively) of about six thousand employees of the lowest category, also working under Panchayat Institutions, who are denied the benefits of those recommendations, on the sole ground of a birthmark, if we may so call it, since they are denied the benefits because before they came to work under the Panchayat Institutions, they were employed in municipalities while the others were Government servants to start with. The unfairness and the injustice of the distinction is patent, whatever legal justification may be put forward. Surely, the State, dedicated as it is to socialism. equality and economic justice and enjoined by the Directive Principles to secure the right to work, a living wage, equal pay for equal work and so on cannot make such a disti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.