SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 425

N.D.V.BHATT
K. VENKOJI RAO – Appellant
Versus
M. ABDUL KHUDDUR KURESHI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.VISHVESHVARA, M.MAHABALESHWARA GOWDA

( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 29-11-1989 passed by the II Additional District Judge, Mysore in R. A. No. 21/1984. The facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal, briefly stated, are as under :

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT filed a suit against the defendant-appellant for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 26-8-1975 executed by the defendant in favour of the former. Plaintiff also prayed for an alternative relief for the damages in the sum of Rs. 6007-24 ps. Plaintiff's case can be briefly summarised as follows: Defendant was the owner of the suit house and plaintiff was a tenant in a portion of the same since 1966. Defendant entered into an agreement of sale of the suit property viz. , the southern half of the entire property for Rs. 14,000/ -. Rupees 2000/- was received as advance by the defendant. Defendant agreed to complete the sale transaction within 3 months from the date of agreement. In the agreement it was mentioned that the sale was for the purpose of discharging the prior encumbrances.

( 3 ) IT transpired that the defendant had earlier entered into an agreement of sale with one Smt. Dhondubai. This fact was not made kn




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top