SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Kar) 264

M.RAMA JOIS, K.J.SHETTY, M.M.MIRDHE
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


M. RAMA JOIS, J.

( 1 ) IN these Miscellaneous First Appeals presented under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act by the National Insurance Company Limited, a Division Bench of this Court has referred the following question of law for the opinion of the Full Bench under Section 7 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The question reads :- whether by force of clause (ii) of the proviso to S. 95 (1) (b) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation in respect of death or bodily injury to any person travelling in a vehicle, though it is not a vehicle constructed and adapted and meant in law for carrying passengers for hire or reward, even to the extent of number of passengers permitted to be carried in the vehicle though not for hire or reward, even in the absence of any extra coverage secured by the owner under the policy concerned in respect of such passengers ?

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case, in the first batch of cases which are sufficient for answering the question referred for the opinion of the Full Bench, are as follows :- the vehicle involved in the accident is a goods vehicle bearing Registration No. MYX 6827 belonging to respondent No. 3 in
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top