SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 68

BAPUJI EDUCATION SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
EDUCATIONAL APPELLATE TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates:
B.VEERABHADRAPPA, C.M.Desai, S.VASANTH KUMAR

R. V. VASANTHAKUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE two civij revision petitions arise out of an Order, dated 18-11-1988 passed by the court of the district judge and educational appellate tribunal, tumkur (hereinafter called as the 'tribunal') wherein the management of a private educational institution styled as bapuji education society and an employee by name narasimha murthy, who was an assistant master in the employment of sumathi jain school run under different management have challenged the legality and correctness of the order passed by the tribunal.

( 2 ) FEW facts are necessary for proper appreciation of contentions advanced, briefly to state are as follows: bapuji education society registered under the societies Registration Act is running a school by name bapuji high school at tumkur district. One rajanna was serving as assistantmaster in the aforesaid bapuji high school. The subject-matter of controversy relates to mutual transfer of the employees. It is seen from the records that on 17-8-1986, the management of bapuji high school has passed a resolution. The relevant portion of the extract is to the following effect: similarly, on 8-8-1986, the managing committee of sumati jain high s















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top