( 1 ) THIS writ petition was taken for hearing by consent of the learned counsel for the parties. Accordingly, I have heard them.

( 2 ) THE petitioner in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has called in question the legality and correctness of the selection of respondents 4 and 5 made in notification, Annexure-D , No. Kmio/ac/1/92, dated 1-1-1992, for admission to m. ch. (surgical oncology) course for the year 1992-93. The prayer sought for in the writ petition is as follows: (A) grant him a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the selection notification No. Kmio/ac/1/92, dated 1-1- 1992 (Annexure-D) in so far as it relates to selection of 4th and 5th respondents for being admitted to the m. ch. (surgical oncology) course for the academic year 1992-93 ). (B) issue a writ of mandamus/any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to admit the petitioner to m. ch. (surgical oncology) course for the academic year 1992-93 or in the alternative to publish in the pre-asscssment marks list, marks secured in the written examination, conduct clinical examination and interview and then