SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 612

RANGANATH MISRA, KULDIP SINGH, M. H. KANIA
Jaghnath – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, BINA GUPTA, K.SWAMY, MONIKA MOHIL, Niranjana Singh, P.P.Rao, V.C.MAHAJAN, VANDANA SAGAR

Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, J.:- This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed by Prahalad Singh claiming that he and other similarly placed Compositors working in the Government of India Presses all over India are entitled to the status and salary of Compositors, Grade I in the ",highly skilled" category with effect from January 1, 1966. The said relief is claimed on the sole ground that one T. R. Thakur has already been given Grade I in the "highly skilled" category as a result of the judgement in his favour given by the Himachal Pradesh High Court. The Writ, Petition (C.W. 62/69) filed by T. R. Thakur was allowed by the learned single Judge of the High Court on May 21, 1971 (reported in 1971 Lab IC 1218) and Letters Patent Appeal against the said judgment was dismissed on, May 9, 1979. The High Court hold that the Categorisation as "highly skilled" and "skilled" on the basis of seniority alone was unreasonable and discriminatory. No special leave petition against the judgment of the High Court was brought to this Court and as such the judgment has become final.

2. Prahalad Singh and others have claimed that they are entitled to the benefit of the judgment given by t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top