SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 194

CAPT. VIPIN MENON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V.ACHARYA RAO, C.V.NAGESH, M.Mari Gowda, T.V.VIJAY RAGHAVAN, U.L.NARAYAN RAO

B. J. HEGDE, J.

( 1 ) ONE Vipin Menon has filed this petition under Section 482, Cr. P. C. to set aside the order dated 15-5-1992 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore City, in Criminal Misc. No. 198/1992. Though the petition was filed only against the State, subsequently as directed by the Court, Sri V. P. R. Nambiar, father-in-law of the petitioner, has been impleaded as the second respondent.

( 2 ) THE facts that are not in dispute maybe set out briefly as follows : the petitioner is the father of a minor female child, named Soumya. She is aged about seven years. Respondent 2 is the maternal grand-father of the minor child. Soumya was residing with V. P. R. Nambiar for some time prior to 29-4-1992. On 29-4-1992, Nambiar gave a complaint to J. C. Nagar Police Station alleging that the petitioner and his sisters had kidnapped Soumya at about 10. 30 a. m. on that day. The police did not register a case either under Section 154, Cr. P. C. or under Section 155, Cr. P. C. on the basis of that complaint as no offence was disclosed. No F. I. R. was sent to the Magistrate. But, the petition was numbered as Criminal Misc. No. 198/1992 and the P. S. I. attached to the J. C.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top