SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 291

KAMALABAI – Appellant
Versus
VITHAL PRASAD CO. PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.S.KAMTE

KEDAMBADY JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Company Petition filed by the petitioner under Section 155 of the Companies Act for rectification of Register of Members of the respondent-Company, directing the respondent-Company to effect the transfer/substitute the name of the petitioner No. 1 in place of her deceased husband Channabasappa and to declare that petitioner no. 1 is entitled for the benefits and profits of the Company.

( 2 ) FACTS of the case speak eloquently. The respondent is a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is a private limited Company with an object of purchase, sell or otherwise, deal in all kinds of oil, lubricants, petrol and petroleum products. The first petitioner's husband and the father of the petitioners 2 to 7 Mr. Channabasappa was one of the Director-Member and a share holder of the respondent-company. He died on 16. 8. 1988 leaving behind him the pe' tioners, the legal heirs. The petitioner No. 1 after the death of her husband, made an application on 30. 10,1988 with the respondent-company for the transmission of his shares and other interest in her name. The true copy of the application is produced and marked a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top