SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Kar) 129

S.A.HAKEEM, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
ROOPA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
PRABHAKAR REDDY – Respondent


Advocates:
M.RAGHAVENDRA RAO, R.B.SADASHIVAPPA

HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is under S. 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, against the order passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, dated 24-10-1990 in M. C. No. 1019 of 1987 rejecting the appellant's petition filed u/s. 13 (1) (1-a) and (1-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

( 2 ) A few facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as follows: the appellant is the wife and the respondent is the husband. They were married on 30-8-1974 at Bangalore as per Hindu customs. After the marriage, they lived together at Wardha in Maharashtra where the respondent was working as a Lecturer. Out of the said wedlock 2 sons were born. The first son, Bharath was born on 24-11-1976 and the second son, Prathivi, was born on 22-8-1978. In the year 1980 they shifted to Thirupathi as the respondent got a job as a Lecturer in the S. V. University College. At the time of marriage, the petitioner was a B. Sc. graduate. After the marriage the petitioner completed her degree course in Library Science in 1975-76 and got the degree B. Lib. Science. In the year 1981-82 she completed post-graduate course in Library Science and acquired M. Lib. Science degree. After completing h























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top