SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Kar) 242

R.V.VASANTHA KUMAR
K. VEERESH BABU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.KUMAR, H.Kantharaj, M.J.N.KUMAR, P.JAYALAKSHMI, SHASHIVARDHAN, SYLENDRA KUMAR

R. V. VASANTHA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) RELIEFS sought for by each of the petitioners in the following writ petitions are as detailed below. W. P. No. 17519/89 (a) Writ in the nature of certiorari declaring that the impugned Rule 230 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules based on Section 129 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and final pronouncement or paper notification by respondent No. 4 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution or any other direction. W. P. 17997/89 (a) To strike down Section 129 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as unconstitutional and the notification given under Annexure-A be quashed by a writ of certiorari and for such other writ or order or direction. W. P. 18344/89 (a) Declare the provisions of Section 129 of the Act and the Rule 230 of the Rules, as ultra vires of the Constitution. (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or order or direction in the nature of a writ not to enforce the provision of Section 129 and Rule 230 against the petitioners or others who drive or ride the motor cycle. W. P. 24862/93 (a) To hold Section 129 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as ultra vires and also to consequently strike down Rule 230 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules 1989. (b) To c


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top