SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 40

G.C.BHARUKA
R. KUMAR AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
VINOD K. CHAWLA – Respondent


Advocates:
JAYPEE ASSOCIATES, SHAILESH AHUJA, Y.K.Narayana Sharma

G. C. BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed by the tenant against the impugned order passed under Section 29 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter in short the act only ). By this Order, the court below has directed the petitioner-tenant to pay Rs. 7,720/- as arrears of rent within one month from the date of the order and continue to pay future rent at the rate of Rs. 950/- p. m.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a tenant in an old structure, which was subsequently purchased by the landlord. At the request of the landlord, the petitioner vacated the said premises with an understanding that he would be reinducted in the new structure which was to be constructed by the landlord, for running his business. An agreement to that effect was entered between the parties on 17-2-1984. Subsequently, when the premises was about to be completed, parties entered into another agreement dated 8-2-1985 (ex. p. 1), clause (k) of the condition No. 7 of the said agreement reads as under : " (k) the lease could be renewed on the expiry of 11 months by mutual consent. However, in case of renewal of the lease beyond 3 years then the rent payable to the first party shall be enhanced












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top