SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 268

KUMAR RAJARATNAM
MOHAMMED JAHIR – Appellant
Versus
NAZRATH FATIMA – Respondent


Advocates:
P.R.Ramesh

KUMAR RAJARATNAM, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER is the husband. First Respondent is the wife. Second, Third and Fourth respondents are minor children of the petitioner and the first respondent. Petitioner and first respondent were married according to the Mohammedan cus tom on 4-5-1975. Petitioner divorced the first re spondent under Mohammedan Law on 13-10-1984. It is also not in dispute that subsequent to the pronouncement of 'thalak' and issue of notice in this regard, the first respondent filed a petition under S. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure claiming compensation at the rate of Rs. 200. 00 in respect of each of the respondents as monthly maintenance.

( 2 ) THE learned Magistrate passed an order on 27 -3-1987 directing the payment of maintenance. Be ing aggrieved by the order dated 27-3-1987, the petitioner preferred a Criminal Revision Petition No. 360/1987 before this Court. The matter was disposed of by this Court on 18-7-1988 by remitting the matter to the learned Magistrate for fresh dis posal after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to cross examine the first respondent the trial Court held that the petition under S. 125, Cr. P. C. , was maintainable and directed that













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top