SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 264

H.N.TILHARI
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
M. B. PATIL – Respondent


H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal which is titled as miscellaneous second appeal and is virtually an appeal under order 43, Rule (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order of remand and may be termed first appeal from order itself has arisen from the judgment and order dated 1-12-1993 given by the additional civil judge and assistant sessions judge, tumkur (sri h. r. deshpande) in regular appeal No. 188 of 1990 arising out of judgment and decree dated 2-11-1990 delivered by the principal munsiff, tumkur in original suit No. 412 of 1989.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-respondent filed the suit for relief of permanent injunction directing the defendants to restore the schedule property to its original condition by filling up the pits and by removing the earth. The plaintiff claimed himself to be the owner in possession of the land marked in the plaint sketch by letters 'abcdefg'. The plaintiff based his claim on the basis of certain registered sale deed wherein the property have been alleged to have been purchased from Smt. lakshminarasamma. The defendants contested the suit and filed the written statement and on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the trial court framed the fo














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top