SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 293

CHANDRASHEKARAIAH
KIRLOSKAR PROPRIETARY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KIRLOSKAR DIMENSIONS PVT. LTD – Respondent


CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is against the order dated 11-l l-1994 passed by the l3th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, on IA-A in OS No. 971 / 1993.

( 2 ) THE parties will be referred to in the course of this judgment as they are arrayed before the trial Court.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using the word "kirloskar" as part of the first defendant's corporate name and/trading so as to pass off or enable others to pass off the first defendant's goods and/ or business as that of the plaintiffs or in some what connected with the plaintiffs and the Kirloskar group of Companies and for damages. In the said suit the plaintiffs have filed an application seeking for temporary injunction restraining the defendants, by themselves, their agents, and/ or any other person claiming under them or through, between, or any of the public from using the word "kirloskar"as part of the 1st defendant's corporate name and/ or trading style so as to pass off or enable others to pass off the first defendant's goods and or business as that of the plaintiffs or in the same way connected with the plaintiffs pending disposal












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top