SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 549

G.C.BHARUKA
CITIZEN OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


G. C. BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THE national law school of India university, bangalore, in its publication "march of the law, 1994", while reviewing legal developments in India in the field of education law, has noticed that 1992-93 will go down in the history of constitutional litigation on education. The debate that started with Dr. Pradeep Jain v. Union of India and others, on the issue of policy on education, specially relating to professional education, dictates several dimensions and Reached Unni Krishnan J. P. and Others V. State of Andhra Pradesh and others , via, Miss Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka and others. The parliament also took immediate notice of the said developments and appropriately responded by enacting Indian medical council (Amendment) Act, 1993 and the dentists (Amendment) Act, 1993. But all in vain. The mischief sought to be remedied could still find their ways to survive with higher vigour openly declaring "we are unconquerable. We survive with ten heads like ravana". The enquires conducted in these proceedings, the documents produced by the central government, the medical council of India and the dental council of India conclusively proves that the managements





































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top