SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Kar) 578

S.VENKATARAMAN
MYSORE MANUFACTURERS, TRADERS (MMT) – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA ELECT. BOARD (KEB) – Respondent


S. VENKATARAMAN, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant who is the defendantant in the lower Court is aggrieved by an order of temporany injunction granted by the lower court restraining him and the arbitrator who is the 2nd defendant in the lower Court from taking any further action pursuant to the notice dated 30-10-1995 issued in case. No. 3/95 on the file of the arbitrator either by filing the alleged award in the Civil Court or taking any further action under Section 114 of the Arbitration Act, pending disposal of the suit.

( 2 ) THE appellant which is a small scale industry had entered into an agreement with the respondent/plaintiff for supply of power to its unit. According to the appellant though the respodent had to instal 200 amps fuses in the pole while supplying the power, only 100 amps fuses were put as a result of which the imported Dixon plant could not be run properly. It is stated that the respondent had illegally disconnected the power supply. There were several litigations between the parties reference to which is not necessary for the purpose of this case. The appellant's case is that because of the failure of the respondent to instal 200 amps fuses it suffered losses and that t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top