SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 268

M.P.CHINNAPPA
NARAYANASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
BOLE GOWDA – Respondent


Advocates:
G.R.ANANTHARAM, G.V.Ramaiah, SHETTY AND HEGDE ASSOCIATES

M. P. CHINNAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed under Section 482, Cr. P. C. questioning the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Cri. R. P. No. 33 of 1993, dated 24-4-1995 dismissing the revision petition and confirming the order dated 3-10-1992 passed in C. C. No. 860 of 1992 on the file of the Munsiff and JMFC, Chamarajanagar, directing to issue process to the petitioner herein.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are: On 27-4-1991 the respondent filed a complaint under Section 200, Cr. P. C. against the petitioner alleging that on 4-3-1991 at about 3 p. m. when the respondent was sitting in the house, the petitioner who is a Sub-Inspector of Police came in his van and questioned him as to whether he was Bole Gowda. On being confirmed, the petitioner assaulted the respondent with his hand, dragged him to the house and assaulted him and booted him and compelled him to show the money said to have been collected by him. It is also alleged that the petitioner abused the complainant's wife in vulgar language and assaulted her on private part, etc. Not being satisfied with it, the petitioner dragged the respondent to his van with the help of his staff and he was confin









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top