T.N.VALLINAYAGAM
KRISHNAJI MORESHWAR JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
BHAKATRAM SADASHIV PATIL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff-decree-holder is the appellant in this second appeal. His application for drawing final decree in FDP 2/82 on the file of the Addl. Munsiff, Chikodi, was allowed by the trial Court on 31-8-1984. On appeal in R. A. 104/84, the learned Addl. Civil Judge, Chikodi has allowed the appeal on 14-8-1986 and dismissed the application. The question of law that is framed in this second appeal is as follows :"whether Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies in respect of an application filed under Order 34, Rule 8, C. P. C. particularly when there is no decree for foreclosure ?
( 2 ) THE averments in the application are that in the suit for redemption of possessory mortgage for Rs. 700/-, a preliminary decree has been passed to redeem the mortgaged property which are 29 guntas in RS No. 174/6, apart from 1/8th right to take water. The decree-holders contended that the amount has been paid in due time and therefore he sought for the final decree. The judgment-debtor resisted the application contending that the decree-holders are not entitled to file the present application as they have failed to comply with the terms of the decree. In the additional sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.