SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 95

G.C.BHARUKA
NAVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA THEATRES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates:
T.K.SESHADRI, UDAYA HOLLA

G. C. BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) SINCE this batch of company petitions involve common questions of law, therefore these have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.

( 2 ) ). These petitions have been filed under S. 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short "the Act") with a prayer to direct the respondent-company to rectify the register of members by entering their names as holders of equity shares to the extent they have purchased and applied for transfer. The board of Directors have rejected the transfer applications filed by the petitioners on the ground that the transfer will not be in the interest of shareholders and the company. The necessary details of each of the petitioners, the shares sought to be transferred, its value and date of rejection has been produced in a tabular form, which is being reproduced hereunder : @@ sl. No. C. P. No. No. of Shares share Cer No. Date of Refusal 1. 26/881011224-1-872752. 27/881044724-1-874723. 28/881028424-1-874834. 29/881047324-1-874695. 30/88106324-1-873576. 31/881015924-1-872637. 33/88109524-1-873148. 39/88106224-1-873469. 108/881022615-9-8610. 36/8964398-11-87@@

( 3 ) MR. Naganand, learned counsel for the respondents,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top