SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 415

A. N. RAY, M. H. BEG, P. N. SHINGHAL
Kerala State Electricity Board, Trivandrum – Appellant
Versus
T. P. Kunhaliumma – Respondent


Advocates:
K.T.Harindernath, S.T.DESAI, T.T.KUNHIKANNAN

Judgment

RAY C.J.I.:- This appeal is by special leave from the judgment dated 3 June, 1974 of the High Court of Kerala.

2. The respondent filed a petition under Sections 10 and 16 (5) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 read with Section 51 of the Indian Electricity Act 1910 claiming compensation against the appellant.

3. The Kerala State Electricity Board is constituted under Section 5 of the Indian Electricity Supply Act, 1948. The Board cut and removed some trees standing on the property of the respondent for the purpose of laying electric line from Calicut to Cannanore. The Board assessed the compensation at Rupees 1619.90.

4. On 10 March, 1972 the respondent filed a petition before the District Judge, Tellicherry under Section 16 (3) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 claiming an enhanced compensation of Rs. 19,367.60 The Board raised several objections. One of the objections was that the petition was barred by time under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Board contended that the notice intimating the fixing of the compensation was served on 4 March, 1969 and therefore the petition was barred by time. The respondent contended that Article 137 of the 1963 Limitation Act did n

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top