SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 243

C. KALEGOUDA – Appellant
Versus
S. SADASHIVAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Sadashivappa, S.V.TILGUL

A. M. FAROOQ, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of acquittal dated 28-12-1993 in CC No. 120/89 on the file of the learned Additional Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandya acquitting the respondent, who was charged on a private complaint for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, hereinafter referred to as the Act and Section 420, IPC.

( 2 ) A private complaint was filed by the appellant against the respondent alleging that the respondent accused purchased fruits from the complainant worth Rs. 8030/- and issued cheque for Rs. 8000/- on 5-7-1989 in favour of the complainant and when it was presented to the Bank, it was returned with endorsement "referred to drawer". It was found that the respondent accused, who had issued the cheque had no sufficient funds at his credit. As provided under Section 138 of the Act, the complainant - appellant issued notice within the time allowed, to the respondent, and thereafter filed the complaint after a delay of 24 days.

( 3 ) THE trial Court took cognizance of the offence and registered the case and the trial proceeded. The trial Court held that there was money transaction between the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top