SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 289

H.N.TILHARI
ASWATHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
H. M. VIJAYARAGHAVA – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.BASAVARYA, R.Gopal Hegde

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, from the order dated 14-12-1993, passed by Munsiff, T. Narasipura on I. A. No. 4 moved in F. D. P. 18/90, in Original Suit No. 22/77, allowing the impleadment of the respondent as defendant No. 4.

( 2 ) ). The facts of the case in nut-shell are that the suit for partition had been filed by the plaintiff Smt. Aswathamma, impleading Kotamma, Sampathamma and Vijayalakshmi as defendants, claiming 1/4th share each against defendants 1 to 3 in the suit. It may be mentioned as observed by the Trial Court, second defendant in her written statement had taken the plea that the deceased first defendant had taken her son in adoption and during the trial registered Will was executed in favour of the present applicant whereby deceased defendant No. 1 had bequeathed the suit property in favour of the son of defendant No. 2, that is the present appellant, but the plaintiff did not implead the applicant in the suit. In spite of issue No. 2 raised in the suit that the property belonged to the applicant-H. N. Vijaya Raghava, present applicant was not impleaded and in those proceedings preliminary decree was got




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top