SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 717

G.C.BHARUKA
MOHISIN ARABEGUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
S.G.BHAGAWAN, V.LAKSHMI NARAYANA, V.Vidya

G. C. BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is one of the 124 lecturers, who had been favoured with temporary appointments against unsanctioned posts for fixed periods and emoluments therefor, by the vice-chancellor of the respondent Mysore university in flagrant violation of the statutory Provisions contained in the Karnataka state universities Act, 1976 (in short, the 'act') from time to time during the last several years. The petitioner h now approached this court under writ jurisdiction for issuance of writ of mandamus to the respondent-university for regularisation of her services meaning thereby for commanding the authorities under the act create a post and absorb her against the same by waiving the mandatory Provisions contained under sections 28, 35, 36, and 49 of the act.

( 2 ) THE present petitioner has filed orders issued by the registrar of the respondent-university (Annexure-a series) by which she had been given temporary appointments from time to time in the university's evening college, mysore. The first part of the order dated 28-1-1997 (Annexure-a8) reads thus. Sub: stop-gap arrangements appointment of temporary (full-time) lecturers at university constituent undergradua





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top