SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 458

Karnataka High Court
Ankit desai - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA - Respondent
Decided On : 09-24-99

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Section 28a (2) and (4) of the Karnataka Taxation Laws (Third amendment) Act, 1996, did not violate Article 301 and were in public interest.

Headnote:

Section 28a - Challenge to the validity of Karnataka Taxation Laws (Third amendment) Act, 1996 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 28-A (2) and (4) - The court discussed the provisions of Section 28a (2) and (4) and their constitutionality under Article 14, 19 (1) (g), 301 and 304 (b) of the Constitution of India. The court examined the power to levy penalty, the requirement of carrying documents, and the restrictions on the movement of goods, and concluded that the provisions did not violate Article 301 and were in public interest.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the validity of Section 28a (2) and 28a (4) of the Karnataka Taxation Laws (Third amendment) Act, 1996, which imposed penalties for non-compliance with document requirements for goods transportation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the provisions of Section 28a (2) and (4) did not violate Article 301 and were in public interest. It held that the power to levy penalty and the requirements for carrying documents were reasonable and aimed at preventing tax evasion.

Issues: The issues involved the constitutionality of Section 28a (2) and (4) under Article 14, 19 (1) (g), 301 and 304 (b) of the Constitution of India, and the impact on the freedom of trade and commerce.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Article 301, the power to levy penalty, and the reasonableness of the document requirements for goods transportation. It relied on precedents to support its findings.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions challenging the validity of Section 28a (2) and (4), and directed the petitioners to file appeals within three weeks if they wished to contest the decision.

V. K. SINGHAL, J.

( 1 ) BY Order dated 26. 6. 1997, the learned Single Judge found that the validity of the unamended section was upheld in the case of sree HAJEE AHAMAD BAVA vs ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX officer Learned Counsel for the petitioner relied the decision given in the case of STATE OF HARYANA vs SANTLAL and submitted that certain questions which have not been raised and considered in the previous decisions require consideration by the division Bench and accordingly the matters were referred to the division Bench by the order of the Hon'ble Chief Justice. All these petitions are disposed of by this common judgment since the questions involved are common. Validity of Section 28a (2) and 28a (4) as enacted by Karnataka Taxation Laws (Third amendment) Act, 1996 have been challenged as being violative of article 14, 19 (1) (g), 301 and 304 (b) of the Constitution of India and declare the same asked the learned Counsel for the petitioner not to argue individual cases in respect of levy of penalty. For the sake of convenience facts of M/s. Kanpha Labs are taken into consideration. The petitioner is dealing in drugs and medicines. The goods were coming from Maharashtra which were intercepted on 10. 5. 1997. Notice was issued to the driver. The executive officer of the petitioner firm appeared before the Check Post Authority and filed the objections. Since there was no seal of the Entry Check post on the documents produced, penalty was levied of Rs. 54,822/ - under Section 28a (4) on 12. 5. 1997. Reply submitted was considered as evasive. Provisions of Section 28a (2) and (4) are as under: section 28-A (2) The owner in charge of a goods vehicle or a boat snail (a) Carry with him a goods vehicle record, a trip sheet or a log book as the case may be; and (b) carry with him a bill of sale or a delivery note obtained from the prescribed authority or such other documents, containing such particulars as may be prescribed, in respect of the goods other than those mentioned in sub-clause (c) carried in the goods vehicle or boat; and (c) carry with him in addition to a bill of sale, a delivery note obtained from such authority containing such particulars as may be prescribed, if the goods carried in the goods vehicle or boat are arecanut, cardamom, cashew, coconut, coffee, copra, edible oil including vanaspati, iron and steel, liquor, oil seeds, pepper, rubber, timber or such other goods as may be notified by the commissioner; and (d) produce the documents referred to in sub-clauses (b) and (c) before any officer-in-charge of check post or barrier Or any other officer as may be empowered by the State Government in this behalf and obtain seal of such officer affixed thereon, and in respect of a bill of sale, shall give one copy marked as original, to such officer and carry and retain with him the other copy until termination of movement of the goods; and (e) on entering the State Limits, report at the first situate check post or barrier and on leaving the State Limits report at the last situate check p9st or barrier and shall give a declaration containing such particulars as may be prescribed in respect of the goods carried in the goods vehicle or boat, before any officer- in-charge of the check post or barrier or any other officer as may be empowered by the State Government in this behalf. 28a (4) The officer incharge of a check post or a barrier or any other officer not below the rank of a Commercial Tax Inspector and not higher in rank than a Deputy Commercial Tax Inspector and not higher In rank than a Deputy Commissioner of commercial Taxes, in respect of any contravention of, or non- compliance with the provisions of sub-section (2) or (3) or (3-A) or (3-B), for which sufficient cause is not furnished, levy a penalty, which, - (a) shall not be less than one half of the amount of tax leviable and not exceeding the amount equivalent to the amount of tax leviable in respect of the goods under transport, if a dealer registered under




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top