SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 492

T.N.VALLINAYAGAM
CHALLAMANE HUCHHA GOWDA – Appellant
Versus
M. R. TIRUMALA – Respondent


T. N. VALLINAYAGAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision Petition is against the dismissal of I. A. II by the first appellate Court by allowing I. A. I and confirming the sale by the first appellate Court. The appellate Court has reversed the order of the Trial Court under which the sale held on 28. 8. 1992 was set aside.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case that given raise to the above C. R. P. is that one Enni Mallikarjuna, in pursuance of a final decree obtained on 9. 5. 1987 filed execution Petition No. 65/1990 on 6. 11,1990 to bring the property to recovery of money; the sale proclamation was published on 19. 7. 1992 spot sale was on 26. 8. 92 and the sale in the Court was on 28. 8. 1992, there were no bidder so far as item 1 to 4 and 6 are concerned excepting item-5 namely the land measuring 1 acre 25 guntas in Sy. No. 144/2 of Yadagigalamana village; only half of the said land was brought for sale and the first respondent herein became highest bidder for Rs 13,000/- on the date when the sale was held on the spot; on 26. 8. 1982; when the matter had come up before the Court for final on 28. 8. 1982 none came forward in bidding for more; on 28. 8. 1982, when the sale was knock down in the name of t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top