SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 482

V.GOPALA GOWDA
PUSHPAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent


V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.

( 1 ) THE first petitioner is the mother of the petitioners 2 to 4 and the legally wedded wife of late Raj anna who was working as a Conductor in the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter called as 'corporation' in short), have filed this writ petition seeking common relief by issuing a writ of cerliorari to quash the order dated 12/18-10-1994 annexure-H issued by the 3rd respondent and further have sought for issuance of a mandamus to the respondents to consider the case of the 2nd petitioner for his appointment in any suitable post on compassionate grounds, as there are no other members of the petitioners family earning for their bread. Therefore, the present petition is filed urging various facts and legal contentions.

( 2 ) THE brief facts which are necessary for the purpose of considering the rival contentions of the parties are stated as hereunder: late Rajanna, husband of the first petitioner and father of the petitioners 2 to 4 was working as a Conductor in the 3rd respondent in chickmagalur Depot of the Corporation. While he was in service, he was suffering from Parkinsonsm disease. Therefore, he submitted representations dated 2-9-1992














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top