SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 831

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, SUHAS C.SEN
PANKAJ BHARGAVA – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER NATH – Respondent


Advocates:
K.C.DUA

Judgment

B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.- This contempt petition is filed by the appellant-landlords in Pankaj Bhargava v. Mohinder Nath{(1991) 1 SCC 556} complaining that the respondents, Shri Ram Prakash and Shri Mohinder Nath have violated the undertaking given by them to this Court by not vacating the house as undertaken by them.

2. The petitioners (landlords) applied under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act on 5-4-1978 seeking permission for creating tenancy for a limited period of five years which was allowed on 6-4-1978. Since the tenants failed to vacate at the end of five years period, the landlords applied to the Rent Controller for putting them in possession of the premises. The respondent-tenants contested the said application inter alia on the ground that a new tenancy was created with effect from 6-4-1983 immediately upon the expiry of the original five years period. The Rent Controller rejected all the defences taken by the respondent-tenants and allowed the petitioners application which was affirmed by the Rent Control Tribunal on appeal. However, on second appeal, the High Court reversed the orders of the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority holding that the very




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top