SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 601

K.R.PRASADA RAO
A. SATHYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
C. NAGARAJ – Respondent


K. R. PRASADA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the complainant against the order of acquittal of the respondent-accused in respect of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), in Crl. A. No. 10004/98 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore by the judgment dated 4-7-98 by allowing the appeal and setting aside the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned X Addl. CMM, Bangalore in C. C. No. 22669/97.

( 2 ) THE appellant-complainant filed the complaint in the trial Court in C. C. No. 22669/97 under Section 138 of the Act alleging that the respondent-accused has issued a cheque for Rs. 5,00,000/- dated 15-3-97 by way of refund of the advance amount received under an agreement of sale transaction for the purchase of the land, when it was ultimately found that the said land does not belong to the respondent. When the said cheque was presented for the payment to the Bank, the same was returned dishonoured with Bank endorsement on 31-3-96 as 'insufficient funds'. Thereafter, the appellant issued notice dated 12-4-96 to the accused calling upon the respondent to pay the said












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top