T.S.THAKUR
RAMANJANEYASWAMI VIDHYA SAMSTHE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE petitions raise questions of considerable general importance besides bringing into sharp focus the neglect and apathy which plague private and government educational institutions in the state of karnataka. The core issue raised and argued at considerable length relates to the validity of the state's decision not to grant any aid to institutions established after the year 1987. That decision has from the year 1998 taken the form of a statutory Rule framed under the Education Act of 1983. The Rule is sought to be justified on the ground that the state's economic capacity is limited and that it can spare no more than what is annually set apart for distribution among private institutions. For the immediate past year the state had set apart no less than six hundred and sixty six crores towards grant-in-aid to private educational institutions. That amount is by no means small even for a state of the size of karnataka, with thousands of pre-primary, upper primary and secondary schools. What has rendered the amount insufficient is a total lack of an effective mechanism to ensure that aid flows only to those who deserve it. Reports that have been drawn up bel
FOLLOWED ON : STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER V AJIT KUMAR SARMA AND OTHERS
KUMARI REGINA V ST. ALOYSIUS HIGHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND ANOTHER
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS V LOK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND OTHERS
REFEDRRED TO : UTTAR PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANOTHER V HARI SHANKER JAIN AND OTHERS
REFEDRRED TO : MISS MOHINI JAIN V STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
UNNI KRISHNAN, J.P. AND OTHERS V STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS
FOLLOWED ON : CALCUTTA GAS COMPANY (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED V STATE OF WEST BENGAL
FOLLOWED ON : STATE OF WEST BENGAL V ANWAR
UNION OF INDIA V P.N. MENON AND OTHERS
REFEDRRED TO : D.R. NIM V UNION OF INDIA
FOLLOWED ON : UNION OF INDIA V M.V. VALLIAPPAN
JAN MOHAMMAD NOOR MOHAMAD BAGBAN V STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS
M/S. ATLAS CYCLE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND OTHERS V STATE OF HARYANA
M/S. MOTILAL PADAMPAT SUGAR MILLS COMPANY LIMITED V STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
VISHUNDAS HUNDUMAL AND OTHERS V STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
GURSHARAN SINGH AND OTHERS V NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE AND OTHERS
COROMANDEL FERTILIZERS LIMITED V UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
M/S. FARIDABAD CT SCAN CENTRE V D.G. HEALTH SERVICES AND OTHERS
UNION OF INDIA (RAILWAY BOARD) AND OTHERS V J.V. SUBHAIAH
FOLLOWED ON : STATE OF ORISSA AND ANOTHER V ASWINI KUMAR DASH AND OTHERS
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION V SADHANA CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ANOTHER V JAGJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER
REFEDRRED TO : MEDIWELL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LIMITED V UNION OF INDIA
ESKAYEF LIMITED V COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
SECRETARY, JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JAIPUR V DAULAT MAL JAIN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.