SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 9

T.N.VALLINAYAGAM
DADABUDDAPPA GOULI – Appellant
Versus
KALU KANU GOULI – Respondent


Advocates:
MOHAN SHANTANA GOUDAR, SHIVAYOGISWAMY

T. N. VALLINAYAGAM, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant in O. S. 142/95 has filed the above revision petition complaining about the witness, DW. 3, who, according to him, turned hostile and the Court below refused to grant such request and permission to treat the witness as hostile. Hence, the present revision petition by the defendant.

( 2 ) HEARD the respective counsel.

( 3 ) SECTION 5 of the Evidence Act speaks about evidence to be given on facts in issue and relevant facts. It reads as follows. "evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts.- Evidence may be given in any suit or proceeding of the existence or non-existence of every fact in issue and of such other facts as are hereinafter declared to be relevant, and of not others. Explanation.- This section shall not enable any person to give evidence of a fact which he is disentitled to prove by any provision of the law for the time being in force relating to Civil Procedure. "

( 4 ) WHILE discussing various types of witnesses, the nature of hostile witness is considered under the above Section 5. Under Section 154 of the Evidence Act, the question of permitting the party to be questioned to his own witness is provided for. Sect














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top