SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 486

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, V.G.SABHAHIT
PATEL ROADWAYS – Appellant
Versus
MANISH CHHOTALAL THAKKAR – Respondent


Advocates:
HEGDE MULKHAND, MOHAN SHANTANA GOUDAR, S.P.SHANKAR

RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) ADMITTED. The matter is heard finally by consent.

( 2 ) THIS appeal arises from the judgment and award dated 10. 2. 1999 passed by the principal district judge and motor accidents claims tribunal, dharwad, in mvc No. 657 of 1996.

( 3 ) THE said claim petition was filed by the widow, mother and minor son of one subhash thakkar, a businessman who died in a motor accident on 1. 5. 94. According to the claimants, on 1. 5. 94 when the said subhash thakkar was travelling in maruti car bearing No. Ka-25-m-1606 on the poona-Bangalore road (near heggana- halli gate, sira), a lorry bearing No. Gqa 6062 came at a high speed being driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the car; and as a consequence, the said subhash thakkar sustained injuries and subsequently died as a result of the said injuries. Feeling aggrieved, the claimants filed mvc No. 657 of 1996 claiming a compensation of Rs. 50,00,000. Two others who were travelling in the said car also died as a result of the injuries sustained in the said accident and their lrs filed mvc nos. 654 and 656 of 1996.

( 4 ) INITIALLY, the claim petitions were filed against the four respondents, i. e. , the driver





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top