SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 308

R.GURURAJAN
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL MAJEED – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Ram Bhat, S.Srishaila

GURURAJAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner for workmen's Compensation and Labour commissioner, Mangalore, dated 2. 5. 2000 passed in Case No. WCA. CR. 41 of 1998. The respondent No. 1 (workman) is engaged by the respondent No. 2 employer. Appellant is the insurance company. I would be referring to them as per their status before the Commissioner.

( 2 ) WORKMAN-PETITIONER filed a petition under section 10 of the Workmen's Compensation Act seeking for compensation before the Commissioner for Workmen's compensation (for short 'the Commissioner') against the respondent employer. His case was that he was working as a driver with the employer. He was driving the lorry Tata 407 bearing No. KA 20-287 belonging to the employer. He was getting a sum of Rs. 3,000 per month as salary. On 11. 4. 1998 at about 7. 30 a. m. as per the instruction of his employer he was driving the said vehicle from Chickmagalur to Mangalore in the course of his employment. When the said lorry reached near balehalli, Kaimara on the Chickmagalur-Mudigere Road, the said lorry met with an accident by dashing against a tree. Due to the said accident, the workman-petitioner sustain
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top