M.P.CHINNAPPA
S. NARAHARI – Appellant
Versus
S. PANKAJA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE undisputed facts are that the first respondent is the wife and Respondents No. 2 to 4 are daughters of Sri C. B. Shankar Rao who was the owner of the property bearing No. 140, Margosa Road, malleshwaram, Bangalore admeasuring 100 x 45 ft wherein the petitioners of these two petitions are the tenants of the non-residential premises more fully described in the schedule and paying admitted quantum of rent. Sri C. B. Shankar Rao passed away in the Year 1989 leaving behind his wife and daughters as his legal heirs. The 4th respondent married one Sharkar Rao in the year 1991 and both of them are practicing advocates of this Bar. They are living in a rented house situated adjacent to the premises and running their law chambers from that residence. The respondent filed HRC No. 66 and 67/94 on the file of Small Causes Judge, Bangalore claiming possession under Section 21 (1) (h) and (j) of the Act alleging that the 4th respondent intends to renovate and remodel the property which are in occupation of the petitioners and to occupy the same for her residence and also to use certain portion as their Law chambers as they are living in a rented premises. It is also allege
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.