SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 663

S.R.BANNURMATH
CHIKKAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
N.P.SINGHVI

S. R. BANNURMATH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent.

( 2 ) APPREHENDING arrest in Cr. No. 101/2001 (wrongly shown as 360/2001 in the petition) of Hangal Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Ss. 143, 147, 323, 430, 447, 504, 506 read with S. 149, I. P. C. as well as under S. 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the petitioners have approached this Court in the present petition inter alia contending that the petitioners are innocent and they have been arraigned as accused with vengeance due to previous enmity. It is also contended that, though the alleged incident is said to have taken place on 7-9-2001, filing of the complaint almost after 11 days of the incident especially involving the petitioners with the offence under the Act is to wreak vengeance and is done with much deliberation and as such it is prayed that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail on the terms deemed fit by the Court.

( 3 ) ON the other hand, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent/state submitted that t


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top