SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 706

R.V.RAVEENDRAN
SANJEEVINI ANANDA AWATE – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR, HIRANYAKESHI SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK R.KALYAN SHETTY, M.S.Subramanya Rao

RAVEEDRAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS matter is placed before me as per the order of the Hon'ble chief justice, under Section 98 (2) of Code of Civil Procedure, in view of difference of opinion on a point of law (regarding interest to be awarded in motor accidents claims) between two learned judges of a division bench of this court, who heard the appeal. The differing views of the two learned judges are reported in Sanjeevini Ananda Awate V. Managing Director, Hiranyakeshi Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane, ILR 2000 kar 4860.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is by the claimants in m. v. c. No. 15 of 1989, on the file of m. a. c. t. iii, belgaum. The claimants were respectively widow, father, mother and two minor children of one ananda awate, who died on 7. 1. 1989, as a result of injuries sustained in a motor accident which occurred on 31. 12. 88. The tribunal by judgment and award dated 16. 9. 1991, allowed the said claim petition in part and awarded compensation of Rs. 76,000 with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the date of petition till realization. In this appeal, filed by the claimants, the division bench by judgment/order dated 26. 9. 2000, has enhanced the compensation to Rs. 2,20,000. Both t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top