SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 62

S.R.BANNURMATH
N. NAGAMBIKADEVI – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashoka Haranahalli, C.V.NAGESH

S. R. BANNURMATH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is arraigned as Accused 4 in Cr. No. RC/22 (A)/2000 by the respondent/central Bureau of Investigation has come up in this petition to quash the proceedings.

( 2 ) THE brief facts leading to the present petition are as follows :the petitioner/accused, who is an IAS Officer, was working as the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Panchayat, Karwar, during the relevant period. The other accused in the case are Smt. Shanthakumari, K. S. A. S. (Karnataka State Accounts Service), the then Accounts Officer, Zilla Panchayat, Karwar, her husband Sri. N. Ramachandra, Sri Rathnakar, Senior Manager, Karwar, and one Sri. Shastri, the then Branch Manager, Varada Grameena Bank, Karwar. According to the respondent/complainant CBI, during the year 1998, Accused 1 Rathnakar, while functioning as the Senior Manager, Corporation Bank, Karwar, entered into a criminal conspiracy with Accused 2 Smt. Shanthakumari, the then Chief Accounts officer,zilla Panchayat, Karwar, and several others unknown, to cheat and misappropriate the Government of India in respect of the funds allotted by the Union Government to the Zilla Panchayat for implementing various Government pro





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top