2002 Supreme(Kar) 266
M.F.SALDANHA, N.K.PATIL
N. B. GUNGARAKOPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Advocates:
C.H.JADHAV, D.L.MOHAN
( 1 ) THE learned single Judge of this Court Narayan J. vide order dated 18-1-2002 has referred the following three points to the Division Bench for adjudication :- (1) Whether Section 18 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (hereinafter called "act" for short) is a bar for entertaining the petition under S. 438, Cr. P. C. ? (2) Whether the Courts entertaining the petitions under Section 438, Cr. P. C. can meticulously examine the material on record and attempt to find out a prima facie case under the provisions of the Act at this stage? and (3) Whether only the High Court has got jurisdiction to entertain the petition of this nature filed under Section 438, Cr. P. C. excluding the concurrent jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge ? the controversies with regard to the grant of anticipatory bail in relation to offences under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been an issue of serious debate despite the fact that Section 18 of the Act appears to place an embargo on the Courts that the provisions of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be invoked in relation to accusations
Click Here to Read the rest of this document