SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 545

V.G.SABHAHIT, N.K.JAIN
K. N. ASWATHNARAYANA SETTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K.MANI, M.R.SHAILENDRA, S.VIJAYASHANKAR, Satish M.Doddamani, V.LAKSHMI NARAYANA

N. K. JAIN, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE writ appeals are filed against the order of the learned Single judge, dated 7-5-2002 dismissing the W. P. Nos. 20194 to 20223 of 2002.

( 2 ) THE necessary and brief facts of the case are: all the piece and parcel of the vacant land of different extents in Sy. No. 49/1 had been notified for acquisition vide preliminary notification dated 6-8-1987. Thereafter, second preliminary notification was issued on 27-2-1990. However, as no final notification could be issued in time the 3rd preliminary notification dated 22-7-1991 was issued under Section 4 (1) of, the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the 'act') (published in Karnataka Gazette on 8-8-1991 ). W. P. No. 21438 of 1991 was filed challenging the acquisition. Pending writ petition, the final notification under Section 6 (1) of the Act was issued on 15-5-1992 and award was passed on 26-5-1993. The State Government on 5-7-1993 issued a letter not to hand over possession as they are going to pass order under Section 48 (1) of the Act and thereafter on 6-7-1993, the petition was withdrawn by filing a memo and praying to reserve liberty to file a fresh petition. Notification under Section 48 (1) of the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top