SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 352

K.SREEDHAR RAO
M. A. RAJU – Appellant
Versus
ANNAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
M.S.GOPALKRISHNA, RUKMINIDEVI, T.N.Manjula Devi

K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree passed by the District Judge, Mandya in R. A. No. 50/94 arising out of the Judgment and Decree passed in O. S. No. 114/91 on the file of Addl. Civil Judge, Mandya. The appellant is the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and for permanent injunction against the defendants not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. The suit came to be dismissed and the consequent appeal is also dismissed. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the present second appeal is filed.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff's contention, he constituted a joint family along with the defendants 1 to 3. The joint family owned around 7 acres of wet land. The first defendant is the father. The second defendant is his mother and the third defendant is the elder brother. It is said that the father and elder brother of the plaintiff found that the property could be conveniently managed by the plaintiff. Therefore, executed a power of attorney to manage the joint family properties. During the course of management of joint family properties, three lands came to be purchased. One land was p


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top