SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 892

MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS-1) – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE two petitions involve interpretation of Section 206c (vi) of the Indian Income Tax Act.

( 2 ) FACTS are as under: the petitioner-Mysore Sales International Ltd. , is a Karnataka Government Undertaking and is engaged in manufacture of arrack. The petitioner is covered by the provisions of the Income Tax Act (for short the Act ). The petitioner entered the arrack trade from 1. 7. 1993 in terms of the excise laws. Prior to 1993, there were several private bottling units in the State of Karnataka and they were manufacturing and selling arrack. Auctions were conducted periodically for the purpose of conferring lease of right of retail vend of arrack. It was conducted with reference to designed areas. The successful bidders are entitled to procure arrack from the bottling units and then sell it in retail trade within their allotted area. The arrack trade is controlled by the State Government. The Karnataka Excise Act has framed several rules for appropriate enforcement of excise laws. In the year 1993, the Government discontinued private bottling units from engaging in the manufacture or bottling units from engaging in the manufacturing or bottling of arrack and instead decid














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top