H.L.GOKHALE, V.K.TAHILRAMANI
Jimmy Abraham Thomas and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent
H.L. GOKHALE, J.:---All the writ petitions in Group (A) above invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India raise common questions with respect to the correctness and legality of the Maharashtra Health Sciences Common Entrance Test (MH-CET 2001) conducted by the State of Maharashtra and the Director of Medical Education and Research of the State of Maharashtra and the results of this Common Entrance Test. Some of these petitions have been filed on the Original Side of this High Court whereas some of them are filed on the Appellate Side and one writ petition is arising out of a letter sent by a student Miss Priyanka Dinkar Borde from Kopargaon, District Ahmednagar, which letter has been converted into a suo motu writ petition. These petitions raise questions with respect to the legality and validity of the results of this examination which were declared on 17th May, 2001 and the consequent admissions to various medical courses. These petitions are undoubtedly of urgent nature. All of them are therefore being heard and decided together finally at the admission stage itself.
2. From amongst these petitions, Writ Petition No. 1658 of 2001 is the first one and is being treate
State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Roundale
Ashok Chand Singhvi v. University of Jodhpur
Nitasha Paul v. Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak
Union of India v. Era Education Trust
Vinay Shankar v. Director General of Health Services
Malikajurna v. State of Karnataka
J.P. Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Medical Council of India v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.