SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 84

S.R.BANNURMATH
ISHWAR SADEPPA NANDENNAVAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK R.KALYAN SHETTY, C.Ramakrishna

S. R. BANNURMATH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Ashok R. Kalyanashetty, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ramakrishna, the learned High Court Government pleader for respondent.

( 2 ) THIS revision petition is filed challenging the judgment of conviction dated 31-8-1996 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate first Class, Bailhongal in Criminal Case No. 274 of 1994 affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Belgaum in Cri. A. No. 100 of 1996, dated 10th july, 2002.

( 3 ) THE brief facts of the case are as follows: according to the prosecution, the complainant who was the driver of non-stop bus from Belgaum to Bailhongal bearing Registration No. KA-25/f-153 left Belgaum at about 10. 00 a. m. on 6-5-1993 and was proceeding towards Bailhongal. According to the prosecution, at about 12. 00 p. m. when the bus had crossed the Sampgaon Village was in the process of travelling and was at a distance of half a kilometre towards bailhongal, a truck came from the opposite side in a wrong way. When the complainant was in the process of taking his bus to the left side, the accused who was the driver of a tempo bearing registration No. KA-24/m-69 came rash and negligently, with great speed overtaking













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top